Journal article
G. Muraca, S. Lisonkova, K. Joseph, A. Skoll, G. Cundiff, R. Brant, Y. Sabr
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2017
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2017
Semantic Scholar
DOI
PubMed
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Muraca, G., Lisonkova, S., Joseph, K., Skoll, A., Cundiff, G., Brant, R., & Sabr, Y. (2017). The authors reply to “The end of forceps deliveries?” and “Beware selection bias.” Canadian Medical Association Journal.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Muraca, G., S. Lisonkova, K. Joseph, A. Skoll, G. Cundiff, R. Brant, and Y. Sabr. “The Authors Reply to ‘The End of Forceps Deliveries?’ and ‘Beware Selection Bias.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal (2017).
MLA
Click to copy
Muraca, G., et al. “The Authors Reply to ‘The End of Forceps Deliveries?’ and ‘Beware Selection Bias.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2017.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{g2017a,
title = {The authors reply to “The end of forceps deliveries?” and “Beware selection bias”},
year = {2017},
journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal},
author = {Muraca, G. and Lisonkova, S. and Joseph, K. and Skoll, A. and Cundiff, G. and Brant, R. and Sabr, Y.}
}
Abstract
We thank Dr. Pairaudeau[1][1] and Dr. Barrett and colleagues[2][2] for their interest and expert commentary on our article.[3][3]
The high rates of severe perinatal and maternal morbidity reported in our analyses may or may not be reflective of adverse outcome rates following midpelvic operative
