Assistant Professor


Curriculum vitae



Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact

McMaster University
1280 Main St. West,
HSC3V - 43B
Hamilton, Ontario ​L8S 4K1
Canada



Key considerations when comparing outcomes by mode of delivery raise questions about study validity and clinical relevance


Letter to the Editor


Giulia M Muraca, Neda Razaz
Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 191(33), 2019, pp. E923


Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Muraca, G. M., & Razaz, N. (2019). Key considerations when comparing outcomes by mode of delivery raise questions about study validity and clinical relevance. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 191(33), E923. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.72687


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Muraca, Giulia M, and Neda Razaz. “Key Considerations When Comparing Outcomes by Mode of Delivery Raise Questions about Study Validity and Clinical Relevance.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 191, no. 33 (2019): E923.


MLA   Click to copy
Muraca, Giulia M., and Neda Razaz. “Key Considerations When Comparing Outcomes by Mode of Delivery Raise Questions about Study Validity and Clinical Relevance.” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 191, no. 33, 2019, p. E923, doi:10.1503/cmaj.72687.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{giulia2019a,
  title = {Key considerations when comparing outcomes by mode of delivery raise questions about study validity and clinical relevance},
  year = {2019},
  issue = {33},
  journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal},
  pages = {E923},
  volume = {191},
  doi = {10.1503/cmaj.72687},
  author = {Muraca, Giulia M and Razaz, Neda}
}

Abstract

In their CMAJ article, Korb and colleagues[1][1] investigated the important and complex issue of cesarean delivery and subsequent severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM). Observational studies comparing maternal and perinatal outcomes following vaginal and cesarean delivery have been criticized for


Share

Tools
Translate to