Journal article
G. Muraca, N. Razaz
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2019
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2019
Semantic Scholar
DOI
PubMed
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Muraca, G., & Razaz, N. (2019). Key considerations when comparing outcomes by mode of delivery raise questions about study validity and clinical relevance. Canadian Medical Association Journal.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Muraca, G., and N. Razaz. “Key Considerations When Comparing Outcomes by Mode of Delivery Raise Questions about Study Validity and Clinical Relevance.” Canadian Medical Association Journal (2019).
MLA
Click to copy
Muraca, G., and N. Razaz. “Key Considerations When Comparing Outcomes by Mode of Delivery Raise Questions about Study Validity and Clinical Relevance.” Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2019.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{g2019a,
title = {Key considerations when comparing outcomes by mode of delivery raise questions about study validity and clinical relevance},
year = {2019},
journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal},
author = {Muraca, G. and Razaz, N.}
}
Abstract
In their CMAJ article, Korb and colleagues[1][1] investigated the important and complex issue of cesarean delivery and subsequent severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM). Observational studies comparing maternal and perinatal outcomes following vaginal and cesarean delivery have been criticized for
