Journal article
G. Muraca, A. Skoll, S. Lisonkova, Y. Sabr, R. Brant, G. Cundiff, K. Joseph
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2017
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2017
Semantic Scholar
DOI
PubMed
Cite
Cite
APA
Click to copy
Muraca, G., Skoll, A., Lisonkova, S., Sabr, Y., Brant, R., Cundiff, G., & Joseph, K. (2017). Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.” Canadian Medical Association Journal.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Muraca, G., A. Skoll, S. Lisonkova, Y. Sabr, R. Brant, G. Cundiff, and K. Joseph. “Response to ‘Data Limitations May Affect Conclusions in Study of Vaginal Delivery at Midpelvic Station.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal (2017).
MLA
Click to copy
Muraca, G., et al. “Response to ‘Data Limitations May Affect Conclusions in Study of Vaginal Delivery at Midpelvic Station.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2017.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{g2017a,
title = {Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station”},
year = {2017},
journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal},
author = {Muraca, G. and Skoll, A. and Lisonkova, S. and Sabr, Y. and Brant, R. and Cundiff, G. and Joseph, K.}
}
Abstract
We thank Dr. Wood[1][1] for his interest in our article[2][2] and his comments. Respectfully, we disagree with several of his assertions, as they are unfounded or incorrect.
Our main analysis was restricted to deliveries that occurred after a prolonged second stage of labour, to ensure an
