Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station”

Letter to the Editor

Giulia M Muraca, Amanda Skoll, Sarka Lisonkova, Yasser Sabr, Rollin Brant, Geoffrey W Cundiff, KS Joseph
Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 189(43), 2017, pp. E1344-E1345

DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.733350

Semantic Scholar DOI PubMed

Cite

APA Click to copy
Muraca, G. M., Skoll, A., Lisonkova, S., Sabr, Y., Brant, R., Cundiff, G. W., & Joseph, K. S. (2017). Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.” Canadian Medical Association Journal, 189(43), E1344–E1345. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.733350

Chicago/Turabian Click to copy
Muraca, Giulia M, Amanda Skoll, Sarka Lisonkova, Yasser Sabr, Rollin Brant, Geoffrey W Cundiff, and KS Joseph. “Response to ‘Data Limitations May Affect Conclusions in Study of Vaginal Delivery at Midpelvic Station.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal 189, no. 43 (2017): E1344–E1345.

MLA Click to copy
Muraca, Giulia M., et al. “Response to ‘Data Limitations May Affect Conclusions in Study of Vaginal Delivery at Midpelvic Station.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 189, no. 43, 2017, pp. E1344–E1345, doi:10.1503/cmaj.733350.

BibTeX Click to copy

@article{giulia2017a,
  title = {Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station”},
  year = {2017},
  issue = {43},
  journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal},
  pages = {E1344-E1345},
  volume = {189},
  doi = {10.1503/cmaj.733350},
  author = {Muraca, Giulia M and Skoll, Amanda and Lisonkova, Sarka and Sabr, Yasser and Brant, Rollin and Cundiff, Geoffrey W and Joseph, KS}
}

Abstract

We thank Dr. Wood[1][1] for his interest in our article[2][2] and his comments. Respectfully, we disagree with several of his assertions, as they are unfounded or incorrect.

Our main analysis was restricted to deliveries that occurred after a prolonged second stage of labour, to ensure an