Letter to the Editor
Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 189(43), 2017, pp. E1344-E1345
Assistant Professor
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact
McMaster University
1280 Main St. West,
HSC3V - 43B
Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1
Canada
APA
Click to copy
Muraca, G. M., Skoll, A., Lisonkova, S., Sabr, Y., Brant, R., Cundiff, G. W., & Joseph, K. S. (2017). Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.” Canadian Medical Association Journal, 189(43), E1344–E1345. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.733350
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Muraca, Giulia M, Amanda Skoll, Sarka Lisonkova, Yasser Sabr, Rollin Brant, Geoffrey W Cundiff, and KS Joseph. “Response to ‘Data Limitations May Affect Conclusions in Study of Vaginal Delivery at Midpelvic Station.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal 189, no. 43 (2017): E1344–E1345.
MLA
Click to copy
Muraca, Giulia M., et al. “Response to ‘Data Limitations May Affect Conclusions in Study of Vaginal Delivery at Midpelvic Station.’” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 189, no. 43, 2017, pp. E1344–E1345, doi:10.1503/cmaj.733350.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{giulia2017a,
title = {Response to “Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station”},
year = {2017},
issue = {43},
journal = {Canadian Medical Association Journal},
pages = {E1344-E1345},
volume = {189},
doi = {10.1503/cmaj.733350},
author = {Muraca, Giulia M and Skoll, Amanda and Lisonkova, Sarka and Sabr, Yasser and Brant, Rollin and Cundiff, Geoffrey W and Joseph, KS}
}
We thank Dr. Wood[1][1] for his interest in our article[2][2] and his comments. Respectfully, we disagree with several of his assertions, as they are unfounded or incorrect.
Our main analysis was restricted to deliveries that occurred after a prolonged second stage of labour, to ensure an